Hunter Biden: Laptop Story

The Hunter Biden laptop story first broke in late 2020 just weeks before the election took place.  Though it has since proven to be the tip of the iceberg, big tech and mainstream media took to the corrupt Bidens’ defense.  Facebook took to censoring the story, or labeling ANY corrupt matters dealing with Hunter Biden’s laptop as “disinformation” on the platform.  Joe Biden labeled the laptop as a “Russian Hoax” during a 2020 Presidential Debate.  Now that the story has proven to be true, with both sides admitting it, there is opportunity for endless analysis of what else Hunter Biden, and family, have been involved in over the years.

    We Said

  1. Mar 17, 2022 Flashback: Filthy Liar Joe Biden Said Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story was a “Russian Plant” During Presidential Debate (VIDEO) (In 2020 at the second United States presidential debate, Joe Biden lied to the American people and said the Hunter Biden laptop story was a “Russian plant.”)
  2. Oct 21, 2020 BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Confirmed – It Wasn’t Russia – Hunter Biden Signed Off On the Request to Repair Laptops in Delaware in April 2019 (Yaacov was able to obtain Hunter Biden’s licenses in both Delaware and the District of Columbia and he compare the signatures on these licenses with the signature of the individual requesting computer service in Wilmington in April 2019. Confirmed: The signatures match.)

    They Said

  1. October 19, 2020 Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say (More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”)

    Consensus

  1. March 17, 2022 Now that Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real (“Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”)